Skip Navigation

Schizophrenia Bulletin 2000 26(4):835-846;
© 2000 by Oxford University Press and the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC)
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopper, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wanderling, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopper, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wanderling, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press

Revisiting the Developed Versus Developing Country Distinction in Course and Outcome in Schizophrenia: Results From ISoS, the WHO Collaborative Followup Project

Kim Hopper, Ph.D. and Joseph Wanderling, M.A., Research Scientist
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research Orangeburg, NY

Send reprint requests to Dr. K. Hopper, Nathan Kline Institute, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962; e-mail: hopper{at}nki.rfimh.org

This article examines the long-standing and provocative finding of a differential advantage in course and outcome for persons with schizophrenia living in "developing" countries, using results from the newly completed World Health Organization (WHO) collaborative project, the International Study of Schizophrenia (ISoS). The article addresses two questions: Has the differential survived the 13 years since it was last reported? If so, are the results demonstrably not attributable to artifactual confounding? The analysis focuses on the 809 subjects who make up the combined incidence cohort of ISoS. These include members of the original treated incidence cohorts of two earlier WHO studies (the Determinants of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorders and the Reduction of Disability Studies) as well as subjects drawn from two additional samples (Hong Kong and Madras/Chennai). We first review the consistency of the finding of a "developed versus developing" differential in course and outcome and then examine a variety of course and outcome measures for the ISoS incidence cohorts. Evidence of differences in illness trajectory in favor of the developing centers was consistently found. Six potential sources of bias are then examined: differences in followup, arbitrary grouping of centers, diagnostic ambiguities, selective outcome measures, gender, and age. None of these potential confounds explains away the differential in course and outcome. We conclude with suggestions for further research, with particular attention to the need for close documentation of everyday practices in the local moral worlds that "culture" refers to.

Keywords: Schizophrenia / culture / developing versus developed / recovery / WHO


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. Alem, D. Kebede, A. Fekadu, T. Shibre, D. Fekadu, T. Beyero, G. Medhin, A. Negash, and G. Kullgren
Clinical Course and Outcome of Schizophrenia in a Predominantly Treatment-Naive Cohort in Rural Ethiopia
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2009; 35(3): 646 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
D. Silove, C. R. Bateman, R. T. Brooks, C. A. Z. Fonseca, Z. Steel, J. Rodger, I. Soosay, G. Fox, V. Patel, and A. Bauman
Estimating Clinically Relevant Mental Disorders in a Rural and an Urban Setting in Postconflict Timor Leste
Arch Gen Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 65(10): 1205 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J. A. Lieberman, R. E. Drake, L. I. Sederer, A. Belger, R. Keefe, D. Perkins, and S. Stroup
Science and Recovery in Schizophrenia
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2008; 59(5): 487 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
J. McGrath
Dissecting the Heterogeneity of Schizophrenia Outcomes
Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 247 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. S. SCHAUFELBERGER, F. L.S. DURAN, J. M. LAPPIN, M. SCAZUFCA, E. AMARO Jr, C. C. LEITE, C. C. DE CASTRO, R. M. MURRAY, P. K. McGUIRE, P. R. MENEZES, et al.
Grey matter abnormalities in Brazilians with first-episode psychosis
The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 191(51): s117 - s122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Isaac, P. Chand, and P. Murthy
Schizophrenia outcome measures in the wider international community
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s71 - s77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
E. Corin and G. Bibeau
Speaking About Culture in Multiple Voices
Transcultural Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 43(1): 106 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Peet
International variations in the outcome of schizophrenia and the prevalence of depression in relation to national dietary practices: an ecological analysis
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2004; 184(5): 404 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Peet
Diet, diabetes and schizophrenia: review and hypothesis
The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2004; 184(47): s102 - s105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.