© 2003 by Oxford University Press and the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC)
The Nosology of Psychotic Disorders: A Comparison Among Competing Classification Systems
Staff Psychiatrists, Virgen del Camino Hospital Pamplona, Spain
Send reprint requests to Victor Peralta, M.D., Psychiatric Unit, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Irunlarrea 4, E-31008 Pamplona, Spain; e-mail: victor.peralta.martin{at}cfnavarra.es
This study examined the concordance and predictive validity of two empirical and two operational classification systems of psychotic disorders. Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to 16 index episode and to their corresponding 16 lifetime symptom ratings of 660 psychotic inpatients, who were also diagnosed according to DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria. The resulting classes or diagnoses were validated against clinical (premorbid adjustment, treatment response, and course) and etiologic (morbidity risk of schizophrenia and major mood disorders) variables. LCA of index episode and lifetime ratings showed that five classes of psychotic disorders provided the best fit to the data: schizophrenia, psychosis, schizomania/schizobipolar, schizodepression, and mixed psychosis (cycloid psychosis for index episode ratings and atypical schizophrenia for lifetime ratings). The concordance between the empirical and operational classification systems was poor. Irrespective of the classification method used, the most powerful validators were the clinical ones, whereas the etiologic validators played a negligible role in validating the classes or diagnoses. Overall, DSM-IV and ICD-10 classifications had more clinical validity than empirical classifications, mainly because of circularity in operational definitions regarding treatment response and course of the disorders. With the exception of the category of schizophrenia, which showed some nosological stability across the four classification systems, the number and type of categories of psychosis were highly dependent upon the set of classification procedures. These results make clear the problems inherent in drawing well-defined boundaries between psychotic disorders.
Keywords: Psychotic disorders / schizophrenia / diagnostic criteria / latent class analysis / classification / validity
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Linscott, J. Allardyce, and J. van Os Seeking Verisimilitude in a Class: A Systematic Review of Evidence That the Criterial Clinical Symptoms of Schizophrenia Are Taxonic Schizophr Bull, September 7, 2009; (2009) sbn181v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. B. Jansson and J. Parnas Competing Definitions of Schizophrenia: What Can Be Learned From Polydiagnostic Studies? Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(5): 1178 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. DiStefano and R. W. Kamphaus Investigating Subtypes of Child Development: A Comparison of Cluster Analysis and Latent Class Cluster Analysis in Typology Creation Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2006; 66(5): 778 - 794. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Steffens, E. Otey, G. S. Alexopoulos, M. A. Butters, B. Cuthbert, M. Ganguli, Y. E. Geda, H. C. Hendrie, R. R. Krishnan, A. Kumar, et al. Perspectives on Depression, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Cognitive Decline Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2006; 63(2): 130 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|