Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on September 21, 2005
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2005 31(4):830-853; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/4/830    most recent
sbi058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hagan, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. N C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hagan, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. N C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Predicting Drug Efficacy for Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia

Jim J Hagan
Psychiatry Centre of Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline plc., New Frontiers Science Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5AW UK

Declan N C Jones
Psychiatry Centre of Excellence in Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline plc., New Frontiers Science Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5AW UK

To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: +44 (0) 1279 622343, fax: +44 (0) 1279 644100, e-mail: jim.hagan-1{at}gsk.com

The purpose of this article is to discuss the prediction of cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia from preclinical data. Despite increasing focus on the significance of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, the progress of novel treatments has been slow. Hyman and Fenton's identification of a "translational gap" between preclinical and clinical science underscores the need to revise preclinical, clinical, and regulatory practice. A review of the clinical literature identifies evidence for some cognitive benefits with current antipsychotics. The magnitude of these effects may, in some cases, be too small to be functionally relevant, and many studies are methodologically flawed, but the data might nevertheless allow translational links to be identified between clinical and preclinical studies. The literature is reviewed to determine if the cognitive signal reported in clinical studies is detectable in preclinical studies. The effects of antipsychotics on prepulse-inhibition deficits in animals is robust and demonstrates a reversal of drug-induced and developmentally induced deficits, although predictive links to the clinic are not well established. The preclinical literature on antipsychotic effects on attention, learning and memory, and recognition and executive function shows, with rare exceptions, impaired learning or task performance, rather than improvement. In general, therefore, preclinical studies have not detected the small pro-cognitive signal evident in the clinical literature. A number of factors may account for this. Effective closure of the translation gap for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia will require the design of a coherent preclinical strategy, and some of the potential elements of such a strategy are outlined and discussed.

Keywords: schizophrenia / cognition / efficacy / prediction / translational strategy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. J. Millan, F. Loiseau, A. Dekeyne, A. Gobert, G. Flik, T. I. Cremers, J.-M. Rivet, D. Sicard, R. Billiras, and M. Brocco
S33138 (N-[4-[2-[(3aS,9bR)-8-cyano-1,3a,4,9b-tetrahydro[1] benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrol-2(3H)-yl)-ethyl]phenyl-acetamide), a Preferential Dopamine D3 versus D2 Receptor Antagonist and Potential Antipsychotic Agent: III. Actions in Models of Therapeutic Activity and Induction of Side Effects
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1212 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
W. S. Stone and L. J. Seidman
Toward a Model of Memory Enhancement in Schizophrenia: Glucose Administration and Hippocampal Function
Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 93 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMENHome page
B. F. O'Donnell
Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia: A Life Span Perspective
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, November 1, 2007; 22(5): 398 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. A. Geyer and C. A. Tamminga
Wayne Fenton's Impact on Academic Neuroscience
Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(5): 1156 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
P. D. Shepard
Editorial--Modeling Negative Symptoms: What's Missing?
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(3): 403 - 404.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.