Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2006
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2006 32(3):538-555; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/538    most recent
sbj077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by McGorry, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by McGorry, P. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis

Warrick J. Brewer1,2,4, Stephen J. Wood3, Lisa J. Phillips2,4, Shona M. Francey2, Christos Pantelis3,5, Alison R. Yung2, Barbara Cornblatt6 and Patrick D. McGorry2
2 ORYGEN Research Centre and Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia
3 Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia
4 Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Australia
5 Howard Florey Institute, Melbourne, Australia
6 New York High Risk Project to the Hillside Recognition and Prevention Program, New York, USA

1To whom correspondence should be addressed; e-mail: w.brewer{at}unimelb.edu.au

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of established psychotic illnesses. However, the association between cognition and emerging psychosis is less understood. While there is some evidence that cognitive deficits are present prior to the onset of psychosis, findings are not consistent. In this article we provide an overview of the more general cognitive findings available from genetic high-risk studies, retrospective studies, and birth cohort studies. We then focus the review on neuropsychological performance in clinically "at-risk" groups. Overall, general cognitive ability as assessed by established batteries appears to remain relatively intact in these ultra-high risk cohorts and is a poor predictor close to illness onset relative to other vulnerability factors. Further decline may occur with illness progression, more consistent with state relative to trait factors. In addition, most established cognitive tasks involve several relatively discrete cognitive subprocesses, where findings from general batteries of subtests may mask specific deficits. In this context, our review suggests that relatively specific olfactory identification and spatial working memory deficits exist prior to illness onset and may be more potent trait markers for psychosis than cognitively dense tasks such as verbal memory. Suggestions for further research address the importance of standardization of inclusion criteria and the maintenance of basic neuropsychological assessment to allow better comparison of findings across centers. Further, in order to better understand the aetiopathology of cognitive dysfunction in psychosis, more experimental, hypothesis-driven measures of discrete cognitive processes are required. Delineation of the relationship between specific cognitive ability and symptoms from data-driven approaches may improve our understanding of the role of cognition during psychosis onset.

Keywords: schizophrenia / high risk / first-episode psychosis / neurodevelopmental / prodrome / cognition


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
S. J. Wood, C. Pantelis, D. Velakoulis, M. Yucel, A. Fornito, and P. D. McGorry
Progressive Changes in the Development Toward Schizophrenia: Studies in Subjects at Increased Symptomatic Risk
Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 322 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. J. WOOD, W. J. BREWER, P. KOUTSOURADIS, L. J. PHILLIPS, S. M. FRANCEY, T. M. PROFFITT, A. R. YUNG, H. J. JACKSON, P. D. McGORRY, and C. PANTELIS
Cognitive decline following psychosis onset: Data from the PACE clinic
The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 191(51): s52 - s57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. R. Yung, H. P. Yuen, G. Berger, S. Francey, T.-C. Hung, B. Nelson, L. Phillips, and P. McGorry
Declining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2007; 33(3): 673 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.