Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2006
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2007 33(1):108-112; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/1/108    most recent
sbl054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, N. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences

Nancy C. Andreasen1,2
2 The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine Mental Health Clinical Research Center, Room W 278 GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 319-356-1553, fax: 319-353-8300, e-mail: luann-godlove{at}uiowa.edu.

During the 19th century and early 20th century, American psychiatry shared many intellectual traditions and values with Great Britain and Europe. These include principles derived from the Enlightenment concerning the dignity of the individual and the value of careful observation. During the 20th century, however, American psychiatry began to diverge, initially due to a much stronger emphasis on psychoanalytic principles, particularly in comparison with Great Britain. By the 1960s and 1970s, studies such as the US-UK study and the International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia demonstrated that the psychodynamic emphasis had gone too far, leading to diagnostic imprecision and inadequate evaluation of traditional evaluations of signs and symptoms of psychopathology. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) was developed in this context, under the leadership of representatives from institutions that had retained the more traditional British-European approaches (eg, Washington University, Iowa). The goal of DSM-III was to create a comprehensive system for diagnosing and evaluating psychiatric patients that would be more reliable, more valid, and more consistent with international approaches. This goal was realized in many respects, but unfortunately it also had many unintended consequences. Although the original creators realized that DSM represented a "best effort" rather than a definitive "ground truth," DSM began to be given total authority in training programs and health care delivery systems. Since the publication of DSM-III in 1980, there has been a steady decline in the teaching of careful clinical evaluation that is targeted to the individual person's problems and social context and that is enriched by a good general knowledge of psychopathology. Students are taught to memorize DSM rather than to learn complexities from the great psychopathologists of the past. By 2005, the decline has become so severe that it could be referred to as "the death of phenomenology in the United States."

Keywords: DSM / phenomenology / diagnostic criteria / diagnostic reliability / clinical interviews


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. J. Cuesta and V. Peralta
Current Psychopathological Issues in Psychosis: Towards a Phenome-wide Scanning Approach
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 587 - 590.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
S. Heckers
Making Progress in Schizophrenia Research
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 591 - 594.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. Moscarelli
Passive and Active Schizophrenia: Toward a New Descriptive Micropsychopathology
Schizophr Bull, June 17, 2008; (2008) sbn057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
P. B. Dunn
Book Review: PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL. By The PDM Task Force. Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations, 2006, 857 pp., $45.00 hardcover, $35.00 paperback
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2008; 56(2): 631 - 638.
[PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Ment. HealthHome page
Et al
Evid. Based Ment. Health, May 1, 2008; 11(2): 38 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
B. Nelson, A. R. Yung, A. Bechdolf, and P. D. McGorry
The Phenomenological Critique and Self-disturbance: Implications for Ultra-High Risk ("Prodrome") Research
Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. Burgy
The Concept of Psychosis: Historical and Phenomenological Aspects
Schizophr Bull, January 3, 2008; (2008) sbm136v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. A. Carlson
Who Are the Children With Severe Mood Dysregulation, a.k.a. "Rages"?
Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 164(8): 1140 - 1142.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.