Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2007
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2007 33(3):673-681; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?
2 ORYGEN Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
3 Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic, Rosamund Road, Maribynong, Victoria, Australia
4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
5 Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
6 Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; ORYGEN Research Centre, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia; tel: +61-3-9342-2800, fax: +61-3-9342-2948, e-mail: aryung{at}unimelb.edu.au.
There is growing interest in the prodromal stage of psychotic disorders, with many services now providing care for these "ultra high risk" (UHR) individuals. However, a reduction in the rate of transition to psychosis has been suspected over the last few years. This has implications for the use of interventions in this population and for the validity of research findings. This study examined the transition rate in one UHR service, the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic, over the years 1995–2000 and investigated possible causes for the transition rate reduction. There was evidence for a declining transition rate, with each successive year showing a rate 0.80 times that of the preceding year. Functioning and symptom level were not responsible for the change. The decreased transition rate was partly explained by a reduction in the duration of symptoms of patients prior to receiving help. That is, UHR individuals are being detected and provided with care earlier than in the past. Thus, the decline in transition rate may be due to treatment being more effective at this very early stage of illness or it may be due to finding more false positives who were never at risk of psychosis, ie, a "dilution" effect. Given that it is not possible to distinguish between these alternatives at least phenotypically at present, perhaps it is time to rethink the role and practice of UHR clinics. Patients presenting to them need help. It may be that we need to aim to prevent a range of target syndromes.
Keywords: schizophrenia / prodrome / prodromal / high risk / ultra high risk / early psychosis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. W. Woods, J. Addington, K. S. Cadenhead, T. D. Cannon, B. A. Cornblatt, R. Heinssen, D. O. Perkins, L. J. Seidman, M. T. Tsuang, E. F. Walker, et al. Validity of the Prodromal Risk Syndrome for First Psychosis: Findings From the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 894 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. T. Carpenter Anticipating DSM-V: Should Psychosis Risk Become a Diagnostic Class? Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 841 - 843. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Raballo, D. Saebye, and J. Parnas Looking at the Schizophrenia Spectrum Through the Prism of Self-disorders: An Empirical Study Schizophr Bull, June 15, 2009; (2009) sbp056v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Welham, M. Isohanni, P. Jones, and J. McGrath The Antecedents of Schizophrenia: A Review of Birth Cohort Studies Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2009; 35(3): 603 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. D. Howes, A. J. Montgomery, M.-C. Asselin, R. M. Murray, I. Valli, P. Tabraham, E. Bramon-Bosch, L. Valmaggia, L. Johns, M. Broome, et al. Elevated Striatal Dopamine Function Linked to Prodromal Signs of Schizophrenia Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2009; 66(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pelosi Is early intervention in the major psychiatric disorders justified? No BMJ, August 4, 2008; 337(aug04_1): a710 - a710. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Schultze-Lutter, S. Ruhrmann, J. Berning, W. Maier, and J. Klosterkotter Basic Symptoms and Ultrahigh Risk Criteria: Symptom Development in the Initial Prodromal State Schizophr Bull, June 25, 2008; (2008) sbn072v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Nelson, A. R. Yung, A. Bechdolf, and P. D. McGorry The Phenomenological Critique and Self-disturbance: Implications for Ultra-High Risk ("Prodrome") Research Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 381 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. McGorry, A. R. Yung, A. Bechdolf, and P. Amminger Back to the Future: Predicting and Reshaping the Course of Psychotic Disorder Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 65(1): 25 - 27. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Cannon, K. Cadenhead, B. Cornblatt, S. W. Woods, J. Addington, E. Walker, L. J. Seidman, D. Perkins, M. Tsuang, T. McGlashan, et al. Prediction of Psychosis in Youth at High Clinical Risk: A Multisite Longitudinal Study in North America Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 65(1): 28 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|