Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on June 5, 2007
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2007 33(4):905-911; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/4/905    most recent
sbm053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jablensky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jablensky, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The Genetic Deconstruction of Psychosis

Michael J. Owen1,2, Nick Craddock2 and Assen Jablensky3
2 Department of Psychological Medicine, The School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
3 School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: +44 (0)-29-02743058, fax: +44 (0)-29-20746554, e-mail: owenmj{at}cardiff.ac.uk.

Psychiatric research, including the search for predisposing genes, has tended to proceed under the assumptions that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, as defined in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, are discrete disease entities with distinct etiology and pathogenesis and that these disease entities can be identified by current "operational" diagnostic conventions. However, recent findings emerging from genetic studies show increasing evidence for an overlap in genetic susceptibility across the traditional binary classification of psychosis. Moreover, the emerging evidence suggests the possibility of relatively specific relationships between genotype and psychopathology. For example, variation in Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) and Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) may confer susceptibility to a form of illness with mixed features of schizophrenia and mania. The elucidation of genotype-phenotype relationships is at an early stage, but current findings highlight the need to consider alternative approaches to classification and conceptualization for psychiatric research rather than continuing to rely heavily on the traditional categorical approach. We can expect that, over the coming years, molecular genetics will catalyze a reappraisal of psychiatric nosology as well as contribute in a major way to our understanding of pathophysiology and to the development of improved treatments. However, our understanding of the brain mechanisms that link specific gene actions and products to the subjective experience of psychopathological symptoms is likely to be bridged by employing intermediate (or endo-) phenotypes in the domains such as cognition, neurophysiology, or neuroanatomy rather than relying upon clinical measures alone.

Keywords: schizophrenia / bipolar disorder / genetics / nosology / psychosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
S. Keri, I. Seres, O. Kelemen, and G. Benedek
The Relationship Among Neuregulin 1-Stimulated Phosphorylation of AKT, Psychosis Proneness, and Habituation of Arousal in Nonclinical Individuals
Schizophr Bull, June 23, 2009; (2009) sbp063v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G. Goodwin and Consensus Group of the British Association for Psy
Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: revised second edition--recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2009; 23(4): 346 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. W. MacDonald and S. C. Schulz
What We Know: Findings That Every Theory of Schizophrenia Should Explain
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2009; 35(3): 493 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
F. Toal, O. J. N. Bloemen, Q. Deeley, N. Tunstall, E. M. Daly, L. Page, M. J. Brammer, K. C. Murphy, and D. G. M. Murphy
Psychosis and autism: magnetic resonance imaging study of brain anatomy
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 194(5): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. van Os
A salience dysregulation syndrome
The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2009; 194(2): 101 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
P.-I Lin and B. D. Mitchell
Approaches for Unraveling the Joint Genetic Determinants of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
E. Ivleva, G. Thaker, and C. A. Tamminga
Comparing Genes and Phenomenology in the Major Psychoses: Schizophrenia and Bipolar 1 Disorder
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(4): 734 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. R. Leliveld, V. Bader, P. Hendriks, I. Prikulis, G. Sajnani, J. R. Requena, and C. Korth
Insolubility of Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 Disrupts Oligomer-Dependent Interactions with Nuclear Distribution Element 1 and Is Associated with Sporadic Mental Disease
J. Neurosci., April 9, 2008; 28(15): 3839 - 3845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. P. Hamilton
Schizophrenia Candidate Genes: Are We Really Coming Up Blank?
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 165(4): 420 - 423.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.