Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on May 10, 2007
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2007 33(4):994-1003; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/4/994    most recent
sbm043v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Are Anticorrelated Networks in the Brain Relevant to Schizophrenia?

Peter Williamson1,2
2 Tanna Schulich Chair in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; University Campus-London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, Canada N6A 5A5; tel: 519-663-3032, fax: 519-663-3935, e-mail: williams{at}uwo.ca.

Most models of schizophrenia are based on basal ganglia-thalamocortical (BGTC) neuronal circuits or brain structures that project to them. Two new neuronal networks have been described which include many of the brain regions associated with BGTC neuronal circuits. These networks have been characterized with a new brain-imaging technique based on low-frequency fluctuations of the blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signal. The new network associated with attention-demanding tasks is referred to as the task-related network and the network associated with stimulus-independent thought during the resting state is referred to as the default network. The 2 networks have been proposed to be negatively correlated or anticorrelated. This article critically reviews the rationale for these anticorrelated networks, the technique with which they are characterized, and preliminary findings in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Regions associated with the default network overlap with regions important in motivation and are activated by memory retrieval, auditory hallucinations, and ketamine. Task-related networks are necessary for performance of neurocognitive tasks on which schizophrenic patients often perform poorly. It is concluded that anticorrelated networks can be viewed as complementary ways of understanding self-monitoring and task performance which extend present models of schizophrenia based on BGTC circuits. However, there are some limitations with regard the present understanding of brain structures involved in self-monitoring and the lack of asymmetry in the network which may mediate stimulus-independent thought. Further investigations of the default network assessed by low-frequency fluctuations in the BOLD signal seem warranted.

Keywords: anticorrelated networks / default network / task-related network / schizophrenia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. L. BUCKNER, J. R. ANDREWS-HANNA, and D. L. SCHACTER
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2008; 1124(1): 1 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. N. Baliki, P. Y. Geha, A. V. Apkarian, and D. R. Chialvo
Beyond Feeling: Chronic Pain Hurts the Brain, Disrupting the Default-Mode Network Dynamics
J. Neurosci., February 6, 2008; 28(6): 1398 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.