Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2008 34(3):444-457; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/3/444    most recent
sbm098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwapil, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Silvia, P. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kwapil, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Silvia, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The Dimensional Structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: Factor Identification and Construct Validity

Thomas R. Kwapil1,2, Neus Barrantes-Vidal3 and Paul J. Silvia2
2 University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC
3 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, PO Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170; tel: 336-256-0003, fax: 336-334-5066, e-mail: t_kwapil{at}uncg.edu.

The present study examined the factor structure underlying the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales and the validity of these dimensions. Confirmatory factor analysis with 6137 nonclinical young adults supported a 2-factor model with positive and negative schizotypy dimensions. As predicted, the schizotypy dimensions were differentially related to psychopathology, personality, and social impairment. Both dimensions were related to schizotypal and paranoid symptoms. Positive schizotypy was uniquely related to psychotic-like experiences, substance abuse, mood disorders, and mental health treatment, whereas negative schizotypy was associated with negative and schizoid symptoms. Both dimensions were associated with poorer overall and social functioning, but negative schizotypy was associated with decreased likelihood of intimate relationships. The findings support the construct validity of a multidimensional model of schizotypy and the use of psychometric inventories to assess these dimensions.

Keywords: multidimensional / schizophrenia / psychometric screening / confirmatory factor analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
J. Miettunen and E. Jaaskelainen
Sex Differences in Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales--A Meta-analysis
Schizophr Bull, July 21, 2008; (2008) sbn075v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.