Skip Navigation



Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on July 22, 2008

Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn091
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eack, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keshavan, M. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eack, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keshavan, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Assessing Social-Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia With the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test

Shaun M. Eack1,2,3, Catherine G. Greeno2,3, Michael F. Pogue-Geile4, Christina E. Newhill2, Gerard E. Hogarty3 and Matcheri S. Keshavan3,5
2 School of Social Work
3 Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
4 Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
5 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; tel: 412-596-7657, fax: 412-586-9531, e-mail: sme12{at}pitt.edu.

The emotion management subscale of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) has recently been recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia committee as the sole measure of social cognition for trials of cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia, yet the psychometric properties of this subscale and the larger instrument in schizophrenia patients have not been thoroughly examined. This research presents a psychometric investigation of the MSCEIT in a sample of 64 early course outpatients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or schizophreniform disorder. Results demonstrated that the MSCEIT possesses adequate internal consistency reliability among its branch and total scales and that patients’ branch and overall test performance was significantly below normative levels. Estimates of discriminant and concurrent validity indicated that the MSCEIT diverged from measures of neurocognitive functioning and psychopathology, but was only modestly related with objective measures of functional outcome. Convergent validity estimates suggested that, contrary to expectations, the MSCEIT did not correlate with a behavioral measure of social cognition. Finally, exploratory factor analyses suggested the possibility of a shift in the latent structure of emotional intelligence in schizophrenia, compared with studies with healthy individuals. These findings support the use of the MSCEIT as a reliable and potentially valid method of assessing the emotional components of social cognition in schizophrenia, but also point to a need for additional measurement development efforts to assess broader social-cognitive domains that may exhibit stronger relations with functional outcome. Further investigation is warranted to examine the instrument's latent factor structure and convergence with other measures of social cognition.

Keywords: social cognition / emotional intelligence / cognitive assessment / MATRICS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.