Skip Navigation



Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on October 3, 2008

Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Javitt, D.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Javitt, D.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Schizophrenia Patients Show Task Switching Deficits Consistent With N-Methyl-D-Aspartate System Dysfunction But Not Global Executive Deficits: Implications for Pathophysiology of Executive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia

Glenn R. Wylie14, E.A Clark5, P.D. Butler5 and D.C. Javitt3,5
2 Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Laboratory, Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Center, 300 Executive Drive, Suite 10, West Orange, NJ 07052
3 Department of Psychology, The City College of the City University of New York, North Academic Complex, 138th Street and Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031
4 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, New Jersey
5 Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Orangeburg, NY 10962

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: +973-530-3664, fax: +973-736-7880, e-mail: gwylie{at}kmrrec.org.

Schizophrenia is associated with cognitive processing deficits, including deficits in executive processing, that represent a core component of the disorder. In the Task Switching Test, subjects view ambiguous stimuli and must alternate between competing rules to generate correct responses. Subjects show worse performance (prolonged response time and/or increased error rates) on the first response after a switch than on subsequent responses ("switch costs"), as well as performing worse when stimuli are incongruent as opposed to congruent ("congruence costs"). Finally, subjects show worse performance in the dual vs single task condition ("mixing costs"). In monkeys, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine has been shown to increase congruence but not switch costs. Here, subjects viewed colored letters and had to respond alternately based upon letter (X vs O) or color (red vs blue). Switch, congruence and mixing costs were calculated. Patients with schizophrenia (n = 16) and controls (n = 17) showed similar switch costs, consistent with prior literature. Patients nevertheless showed increased congruence and mixing costs. In addition, relative to controls, patients showed worse performance across conditions in the letter vs color tasks, suggesting deficits in form vs color processing. Overall, while confirming executive dysfunction in schizophrenia, this study indicates that not all aspects of executive control are impaired and that the task switching paradigm may be useful for evaluating neurochemical vs neuroanatomic hypotheses of schizophrenia.

Keywords: executive control / task switching / schizophrenia / N-methyl-D-aspartate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.