Skip Navigation



Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on November 27, 2009

Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp149
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mamo, D. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uchida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mamo, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Low Dose vs Standard Dose of Antipsychotics for Relapse Prevention in Schizophrenia: Meta-analysis

Hiroyuki Uchida13, Takefumi Suzuki35, Hiroyoshi Takeuchi2, Tamara Arenovich6 and David C. Mamo35
2 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
3 Geriatric Mental Health Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4 Multimodal Imaging Group, PET Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
6 Biostatistical Consulting Service, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: +81 3 5363 3829, fax: +81 3 5379 0187, e-mail: mcn41320{at}biglobe.ne.jp.

Background: It remains unknown as to whether the antipsychotic dose needed for the acute-phase treatment of schizophrenia is also necessary for relapse prevention. Aim: To compare the efficacy between standard dose [(World Health Organization daily defined dose (DDD)] vs low dose (≥50% to <1 DDD) or very low dose (<50% DDD) for relapse prevention in schizophrenia. Data source: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials with a follow-up duration of ≥24 weeks, including ≥2 dosage groups of the same antipsychotic drug for relapse prevention in schizophrenia, were searched using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE (last search: August 2009). Data extraction: Data on overall treatment failure, hospitalization, relapse, and dropouts due to side effects were extracted and combined in a meta-analysis. Data synthesis: Thirteen studies with 1395 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the standard-dose treatment, the low-dose therapy did not show any statistically significant difference in overall treatment failure or hospitalization, while the standard dose showed a trend-level (P = .05) superiority in risk of relapse. The very low–dose group was inferior to the standard-dose group in all efficacy parameters. No significant difference was found in the rate of dropouts due to side effects between either standard dose vs low dose or very low dose. Conclusions: Although antipsychotic treatment with ≥50% to <1 DDD may be as effective as standard-dose therapy, there are insufficient clinical trial data to draw firm conclusions on standard- vs low-dose maintenance antipsychotic therapy for schizophrenia.

Keywords: antipsychotic / dose / neuroleptic / relapse prevention / schizophrenia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.