Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on December 3, 2007
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2008 34(2):249-250; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm135
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Commentary on Alex Cohen et al: "Questioning an Axiom: Better Prognosis for Schizophrenia in the Developing World"
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, William James Hall, Room 330, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, the field of cross-cultural (or transcultural) psychiatry provided what was largely Euro American psychiatry with several useful alternatives. Based on limited research, it balanced the near hegemonic American and British research materials and conclusions with data from the non-Western world, and with new findings about established psychiatric disorders that challenged diagnoses, programs, and treatments. Cultural psychiatry still provides those contributions, but psychiatry itself has changed. We are now in an era of
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 617-495-3846, fax: 617-495-3557, e-mail: kleinman@wjh.harward.edu.