Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2008
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2008 34(2):256-257; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm154
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/2/256    most recent
sbm154v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromet, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bromet, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Cross-National Comparisons: Problems in Interpretation When Studies Are Based on Prevalent Cases

Evelyn J. Bromet1,2
2 Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Stony Brook, Putnam Hall-South Campus, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8790

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


Cohen et al challenge the belief, stemming largely from the World Health Organization (WHO) schizophrenia research program, that "schizophrenia has a better course and outcome in countries of the developing world" compared with developed countries. They thus examine findings on illness course, mortality, and social and occupational outcomes across an array of studies conducted in low- or middle-income countries throughout the world. They consider findings from all follow-up studies of schizophrenia conducted in these countries, without regard to case identification specification or length of follow-up. The outcome results across the studies identified by Cohen et al were variable, and in some cases, the samples fared very poorly indeed. Because none of the studies had control groups, cross-national disparities in the social and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 631-632-8853, fax: 631-632-9433, e-mail: ebromet@notes.cc.sunysb.edu.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. Alem, D. Kebede, A. Fekadu, T. Shibre, D. Fekadu, T. Beyero, G. Medhin, A. Negash, and G. Kullgren
Clinical Course and Outcome of Schizophrenia in a Predominantly Treatment-Naive Cohort in Rural Ethiopia
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2009; 35(3): 646 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]