Skip Navigation


Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on September 15, 2005
Schizophrenia Bulletin 2005 31(4):800-805; doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi061
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/4/800    most recent
sbi061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Is the Dysbindin Gene (DTNBP1) a Susceptibility Gene for Schizophrenia?

Nigel M Williams
Department of Psychological Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Biomedical Research, College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK CF14 4XN

Michael C O'Donovan
Department of Psychological Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Biomedical Research, College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK CF14 4XN

Michael J Owen
Department of Psychological Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Biomedical Research, College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK CF14 4XN


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Over recent years the gene DTNBP1 (chromosome 6p24-22) has emerged as one of the most promising candidate genes for schizophrenia. In this article, we review the current genetic evidence that implicates DTNBP1 as a schizophrenia-susceptibility gene. While there is now impressive support from genetic association studies, it is important to remain aware that the actual DTNBP1 susceptibility variants have not been identified. While functional analyses have allowed us to speculate their likely function, only when they are identified will we be able to confidently specify the type of altered gene function that is relevant to schizophrenia pathogenesis. This we hope will then open up new vistas for neurobiological research, allowing us to study the exact contribution of DTNBP1 in schizophrenia, its relationships with various aspects of the phenotype, and the potential of epistatic interactions with other genes, as well as functional interactions between the gene products.

Keywords: schizophrenia / dysbindin / DTNBP1 / gene / association



    Introduction: Genetic Evidence Supporting DTNBP1 as a Schizophrenia Susceptibility Locus
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Chromosome 6p24-22 is the location of one of the most well established linkages to schizophrenia.1–5 In the absence of very clear positional candidate genes, and even arguably when such genes exist, association analysis using a grid of genetic markers spanning the region is typically the method of choice for progressing from linkage to a causal gene. This was the approach used by Straub and colleagues.6 Using their sample of Irish families in whom linkage was initially observed,1 they were able to identify significant evidence for association (p = .008 to p = .0001) between schizophrenia and several individual markers as well as haplotypes (a series of nucleotides occurring on the same chromosome) that spanned DTNBP1, the gene encoding dystrobrevin binding protein 1, or dysbindin (figure 1).6



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Genomic organization of the DTNBP1 gene together with the known and putative alternatively spliced transcripts as derived from the University of California, Santa Cruz, human genome reference sequence (May 2004 freeze). The relative locations of the genetic markers genotyped in each study to date are indicated.

 
Given that it was the first reported gene for schizophrenia identified by positional cloning, this initial report was fairly rapidly followed by attempts to replicate these findings in independent samples (figure 1). Schwab and colleagues performed the first such replication attempt, using 78 German and Israeli families (also showing evidence for linkage to 6p) and 127 proband parent trios, mainly from Germany but including a small number of subjects from Hungary.7 Both samples independently gave evidence for both single-marker and haplotypic association, with the combined data sets giving strong evidence (p = .00001) for a 3-marker haplotype. Van Den Bogaert and colleagues studied 5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in their samples of 142 cases and 272 controls from Poland, Germany, and Sweden.8 While the first 2 samples failed to show any evidence for association, the researchers did identify significant haplotypes (p = .0098) in the Swedish sample that were even more significant in their subset of cases with a family history of schizophrenia (p = .00009). Kirov and colleagues similarly found evidence in favor of dysbindin as a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia in 488 parent proband trios from Bulgaria (minimum p < .001),9 as did Funke et al. in 258 Caucasian cases and 467 controls as well as in 51 Hispanic cases and 32 matched controls.10 Tang and colleagues extended the evidence to samples of non-European origin when they reported significant haplotypic association using a sample of 223 parent proband trios from China (p = .00072),11 as did Numakawa and colleagues in 670 Japanese cases and 588 controls (minimum p = .001).12 Not all studies have used the same genetic markers, but even allowing for this, there is considerable disagreement between studies with respect to the specific markers and haplotypes that have been reported to be associated (table 1). Nevertheless, such a substantial body of supportive evidence for association at a single gene is unprecedented in studies of schizophrenia and is far beyond what can be attributed simply to chance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Complex Pattern of Genetic Association at DTNBP1

 
All of the above studies used panels of SNPs selected from public databases, and therefore it was not a priori particularly likely that any would actually have a direct pathogenic role in the function of DTNBP1. Instead, as in the original study, the replication studies relied on the hope that the marker SNPs analyzed were sufficiently close to the true risk variant(s) to be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with it. LD arises when the population-specific history of recombination events between 2 polymorphic sites has been inadequate to result in allelic independence between the loci, that is, genotypes at each site are to some extent correlated. This means that where an allele contributes to a disease, any correlated allele at an adjacent marker in LD should also be associated indirectly with disease, although whether such an association is detectable depends upon the degree of correlation, the size of the genetic effect, and the sample size examined. It is worth stressing that the degree of correlation between 2 sites may be highly population dependent, as might the size of the contribution of any single variant (due, for example, to differences in frequencies of environmental factors or other risk alleles with which the variant in question interacts). Such factors alone can potentially explain sample-specific patterns of association. Other possible explanations are the existence of multiple risk alleles at an individual gene (known as allelic heterogeneity) with the pattern varying across populations or that some of the positive findings are false positives due to chance, stratification, or genotyping errors. Clearly, false positives can add to the apparent heterogeneity. Moreover, genetic and etiological heterogeneity can greatly affect the power of individual replication studies, which are already compromised by the small contribution to overall disease susceptibility (odds ratio < 2.5) associated with the markers or haplotypes identified thus far. Consequently, it is not unexpected that when using these particular panels of SNPs, some studies failed to show any evidence for association with schizophrenia.8, 13–14

While factors such as these can explain the variability in patterns of LD across studies, and even some failures to replicate, it does not follow that they do so. In an attempt to avoid some of the limitations of LD, we set out to try to identify schizophrenia-susceptibility variants using a direct association approach. Thus, instead of relying on databases, we undertook polymorphism discovery. A disadvantage of that approach is that it is difficult to know when all possible functional domains of a gene have been scanned. Williams and colleagues focused their efforts on regions of the gene thought most likely to harbor functional variants, namely, all the known and predicted exons (specific segments of the gene that are transcribed to give an mRNA gene product) as well as 4 putative alternative promoter regions (specific genomic regions that regulate gene expression).14 Moreover, because of the limitations, they supplemented their analyses by seeking evidence for indirect association based upon haplotypes. Three novel SNPs yielded weak evidence for association with schizophrenia; but when included in haplotypes with SNPs from the original study,6 1 novel marker (rs2619538) yielded highly significant evidence for association (minimum global p = .00005). The evidence for haplotype association appeared to come from 1 common risk haplotype (p = .013), 1 common protective haplotype (p = .006), and 1 uncommon protective haplotype (p = 7 x 10–7). Interestingly, when the same marker was added to an Irish sample that also had not shown evidence for association at the DTNBP1 gene using original markers,13 an identical pattern of association was observed (table 1).14


    Functional Effect of DTNBP1 Risk Variants at the Gene Level
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Taken together, the data from 14 samples, 11 of which show statistically significant association with schizophrenia (table 1), provide strong evidence that DTNBP1 is a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia; but until the actual susceptibility variants that confer disease risk are identified, it is inevitable that a degree of skepticism about the finding will remain. When the true susceptibility variants are identified, we will also be able to confidently specify at a mechanistic level what type of altered gene function, be it increased normal, reduced normal, or some novel function, is relevant to schizophrenia pathogenesis. Until then we can make some informed speculations.

Most simple genetic disorders are caused by missense and nonsense mutations that change the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein and therefore its function. However, even moderately common polymorphisms of this nature have effectively been excluded by the direct association approach,14 while unpublished sequence data from a much larger sample of schizophrenics also indicate that the existing association evidence is not caused by the accumulation of rare variants either (R. Straub, personal communication, August 2005).

Another possible mechanism that is generally held (without a large body of empirical data in support) to be particularly important in complex disorder is sequence variation, which affects the amount of the gene expressed. For DTNBP1 this is a genuine possibility, as it has been shown that polymorphisms exist in DTNBP1 that influence its expression in the human brain.15–16 Others have shown that dysbindin mRNA and protein levels are decreased in the hippocampal formation17 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex18 of schizophrenics. However, again, until it is functionally tied to specific risk variants, it is possible that reduced expression is not the causal mechanism but, instead, is a response to it, for example, a hyperfunctioning allele. Bray and colleagues recently followed up their original study by examining the expression levels of mRNA from specific haplotypes in individuals heterozygous for those haplotypes.16 Intriguingly, they were able to demonstrate that the "risk" haplotype identified by the same group14 was expressed at a lower level than other haplotypes. Their analysis also provides preliminary evidence that the risk and protective haplotypes identified in other sample groups7–10 index low and high expression, respectively. These data await independent replication but, if confirmed, suggest low expression as a common mechanism underpinning the diversity of associated haplotypes (table 1).

While we remain aware that other pathogenic mechanisms that influence DTNBP1 function may yet prove to be important, for example, mRNA splicing or up-regulation of a minor transcript, the current evidence suggests strongly that the as-yet-unknown cis-acting variants that reduce DTNBP1 expression are prime candidates for being the true DTNBP1 susceptibility variants. However, there are numerous possible places where polymorphisms influencing expression might be localized, many of which can be distal to the gene and most of which are very difficult to predict. It therefore seems likely that the identification of DTNBP1 cis-acting variants will require resequencing of the entire DTNBP1 gene in a considerable number of affected individuals from each associated sample set. Putative susceptibility variants will then have to have their function confirmed by correlation with low expression in vivo and through direct analyses of function in vitro. Their relevance to schizophrenia will also require retesting by genetic association.


    How Altered Dysbindin Function Might Lead to Schizophrenia
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Dysbindin is a ubiquitously expressed protein.19 Although only 2 protein isoforms have been reported (40–51 kDa),19–20 bioinformatic analysis14 (figure 1) and analysis of polymerase chain reaction–amplified products from cDNA (Straub, personal communication, August 2005) suggest that many more mRNAs exist, but whether these encode active proteins remains to be seen. Dysbindin is part of the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DPC), specifically, {alpha}- and ß-dystrobrevins.19 The dystrophin complex is found in the sarcolemma of muscle but is also located in postsynaptic densities in a number of brain areas. In the brain, dysbindin expression is thought to be confined to neurons, where it is both pre- and postsynaptic. Its expression is particularly intense in axons and mossy fiber synaptic terminals in the cerebellum and hippocampus, where it appears to be presynaptic.19 Of possible relevance to schizophrenia, dysbindin is expressed in glutamatergic neurons and synapses of the hippocampus.19, 21

Recently, in addition to being a component of the DPC, dysbindin has emerged as a component of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1).20 This came to light when it was shown that Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome (HPS) type 7 can be caused by a nonsense mutation in the DTNBP1 gene.20 HPS is characterized by oculocutaneous albinism, prolonged bleeding time, and pulmonary fibrosis due to abnormal vesicle trafficking to lysosomes and related organelles such as platelet-dense granules and melanosomes. No major psychiatric manifestations have so far been documented. The sandy mouse is a model of HPS7 and is caused by an in-frame deletion of 2 exons of the murine dysbindin gene.20 It therefore represents a naturally occurring dysbindin knockout.

At the time of writing how dysbindin's role in the DPC or BLOC-1 relates, if at all, to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia is unknown. Initially it was speculated that dysbindin may influence schizophrenia risk through postsynaptic mechanisms.6 However, the study by Talbot and colleagues,17 reporting a significant reduction in presynaptic dysbindin expression in several hippocampal regions and an inverse relationship between presynaptic dysbindin and the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGlutT-1), suggests the possibility of a mechanism related to glutamate release. This hypothesis is supported circumstantially by the demonstration that knockdown of endogenous dysbindin protein results in reduction of glutamate release.12 One attractive interpretation of these data is that polymorphisms in DTNBP1 result in reduced expression of dysbindin, that this results in disturbances of BLOC-1 function, and that among other things, this affects intracellular trafficking of glutamate vesicles and reduced glutamate release. However, whether this is of any relevance to dysbindin's role in schizophrenia is as yet uncertain. What is certain is that dysbindin and its multiple functions are likely to occupy a prominent role in schizophrenia research over the next few years.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 
The large volume of supportive evidence implicating DTNBP1 as a schizophrenia-susceptibility gene has catapulted both schizophrenia genetics and schizophrenia biology into an exciting phase. However, it is important to emphasize that there remains room for caution. So far, the risk haplotypes do not fully explain the initial linkage findings at 6p24-22 that prompted the follow-up association analysis. While this could suggest that the associated polymorphisms/haplotypes are only weakly correlated with the true pathogenic variants, it is also possible that the linkages reflect multiple risk alleles at each locus or even variation at 2 or more genes. In addition, in order to unambiguously confirm that DTNBP1 is a schizophrenia-susceptibility gene, it is a priority that we isolate its susceptibility variants. The current evidence suggests that these are likely to contribute to disease susceptibility by influencing DTNBP1 expression. However, in light of their unknown location and probable allelic heterogeneity, identifying these susceptibility variants will be a considerable task. Finally, an important lesson is that the initial linkage to 6p24-22 and subsequent identification of DTNBP1 were achieved by exploiting the classical clinical schizophrenia phenotype. This is not to say that when valid, and hopefully genetically less complex, endophenotypes are available the task will not be easier. However, in the meantime, we should acknowledge that the schizophrenia phenotype is of proven utility and can allow genetic studies to deliver crucial insights into the nature of the disorder.


   Footnotes
 
To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: (44) 02920 746588, fax: (44) 02920 746554, e-mail: williamsnm{at}cf.ac.uk


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to the Medical Research Council, which supports most of our research into schizophrenia via a program grant. We are also grateful to the Wellcome Trust and to the National Institute of Mental Health for their project grant support.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: Genetic Evidence...
 Functional Effect of DTNBP1...
 How Altered Dysbindin Function...
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Straub, RE, MacLean, CJ, O'Neill, FA, et al. A potential vulnerability locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 6p24-22: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Nat Genet 1995; 11:287–293.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  2. Moises, HW, Yang, L, Kristbjarnarson, H, et al. An international two-stage genome-wide search for schizophrenia susceptibility genes. Nat Genet 1995; 11:321–324.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  3. . Schizophrenia Linkage Collaborative Group for Chromosomes 3, 6 and 8. Additional support for schizophrenia linkage on chromosomes 6 and 8: a multicenter study. Am J Med Genet 1996; 67:580–594.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  4. Schwab, SG, Hallmayer, J, Albus, M, et al. A genome-wide autosomal screen for schizophrenia susceptibility loci in 71 families with affected siblings: support for loci on chromosome 10p and 6. Mol Psychiatr 2000; 5:638–649.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  5. Lewis, CM, Levinson, DF, Wise, LH, et al. Genome scan meta-analysis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, part II: schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73:34–48.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  6. Straub, RE, Jiang, Y, MacLean, CJ, et al. Genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene DTNBP1, the human ortholog of the mouse dysbindin gene, is associated with schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71:337–348.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  7. Schwab, SG, Knapp, M, Mondabon, S, et al. Support for association of schizophrenia with genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene, dysbindin, in sib-pair families with linkage and in an additional sample of triad families. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:185–190.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  8. Van Den Bogaert, A, Schumacher, J, Schulze, TG, et al. The DTNBP1 (dysbindin) gene contributes to schizophrenia, depending on family history of the disease. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 73:1438–1443.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  9. Kirov, G, Ivanov, D, Williams, NM, et al. Strong evidence for association between the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 gene (DTNBP1) and schizophrenia in 488 parent–offspring trios from Bulgaria. Biol Psychiat 2004; 55:971–975.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  10. Funke, B, Finn, CT, Plocik, AM, et al. Association of the DTNBP1 locus with schizophrenia in a U.S. population. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75:891–898.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  11. Tang, JX, Zhou, J, Fan, JB, et al. Family-based association study of DTNBP1 in 6p22.3 and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatr 2003; 8:717–718.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  12. Numakawa, T, Yagasaki, Y, Ishimoto, T, et al. Evidence of novel neuronal functions of dysbindin, a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13:2699–2708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Morris, DW, McGhee, KA, Schwaiger, S, et al. No evidence for association of the dysbindin gene [DTNBP1] with schizophrenia in an Irish population-based study. Schizophr Res 2003; 60:167–172.[Web of Science][Medline]

  14. Williams, NM, Preece, A, Morris, DW, et al. Identification in 2 independent samples of a novel schizophrenia risk haplotype of the dystrobrevin binding protein gene (DTNBP1). Arch Gen Psychiat 2004; 61:336–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Bray, NJ, Buckland, PR, Owen, MJ, O'Donovan, MC. Cis-acting variation in the expression of a high proportion of genes in human brain. Hum Genet 2003; 113:149–153.[Web of Science][Medline]

  16. Bray, NJ, Preece, A, Williams, NM, et al. Haplotypes at the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) gene locus mediate risk for schizophrenia through reduced DTNBP1 expression. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14:1947–1954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Talbot, K, Eidem, WL, Tinsley, CL, et al. Dysbindin-1 is reduced in intrinsic, glutamatergic terminals of the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia. J Clin Invest 2004; 113:1353–1363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  18. Weickert, CS, Straub, RE, McClintock, BW, et al. Human dysbindin (DTNBP1) gene expression in normal brain and in schizophrenic prefrontal cortex and midbrain. Arch Gen Psychiat 2004; 61:544–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Benson, MA, Newey, SE, Martin-Rendon, E, Hawkes, R, Blake, DJ. Dysbindin, a novel coiled-coil-containing protein that interacts with the dystrobrevins in muscle and brain. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:24232–24241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Li, W, Zhang, Q, Oiso, N, et al. Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome type 7 (HPS-7) results from mutant dysbindin, a member of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1). Nat Genet 2003; 35:84–89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  21. Sillitoe, RV, Benson, MA, Blake, DJ, Hawkes, R. Abnormal dysbindin expression in cerebellar mossy fiber synapses in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurosci 2003; 23:6576–6585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. van den Oord, EJ, Sullivan, PF, Jiang, Y, et al. Identification of a high-risk haplotype for the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) gene in the Irish study of high-density schizophrenia families. Mol Psychiatr 2003; 8:499–510.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. K. Dickman and G. W. Davis
The Schizophrenia Susceptibility Gene dysbindin Controls Synaptic Homeostasis
Science, November 20, 2009; 326(5956): 1127 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. van den Buuse
Modeling the Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia in Genetically Modified Mice: Pharmacology and Methodology Aspects
Schizophr Bull, November 9, 2009; (2009) sbp132v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Tang, R. P. LeGros, N. Louneva, L. Yeh, J. W. Cohen, C.-G. Hahn, D. J. Blake, S. E. Arnold, and K. Talbot
Dysbindin-1 in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia cases is reduced in an isoform-specific manner unrelated to dysbindin-1 mRNA expression
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2009; 18(20): 3851 - 3863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
S. W. Woods, J. Addington, K. S. Cadenhead, T. D. Cannon, B. A. Cornblatt, R. Heinssen, D. O. Perkins, L. J. Seidman, M. T. Tsuang, E. F. Walker, et al.
Validity of the Prodromal Risk Syndrome for First Psychosis: Findings From the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study
Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 894 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
B. Crespi, K. Summers, and S. Dorus
Adaptive evolution of genes underlying schizophrenia
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2007; 274(1627): 2801 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
N. ANDREONE, M. TANSELLA, R. CERINI, A. VERSACE, G. RAMBALDELLI, C. PERLINI, N. DUSI, L. PELIZZA, M. BALESTRIERI, C. BARBUI, et al.
Cortical white-matter microstructure in schizophrenia: Diffusion imaging study
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(2): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
M. J. Owen, N. Craddock, and A. Jablensky
The Genetic Deconstruction of Psychosis
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 905 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
N. Craddock, M. C. O'Donovan, and M. J. Owen
Phenotypic and genetic complexity of psychosis: Invited commentary on ... Schizophrenia: a common disease caused by multiple rare alleles
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 190(3): 200 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. J. Bizzarro, N. Hussain, B. Jonsson, R. Feng, L. R. Ment, J. R. Gruen, H. Zhang, and V. Bhandari
Genetic Susceptibility to Retinopathy of Prematurity
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1858 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. Talbot, D.-S. Cho, W.-Y. Ong, M. A. Benson, L.-Y. Han, H. A. Kazi, J. Kamins, C.-G. Hahn, D. J. Blake, and S. E. Arnold
Dysbindin-1 is a synaptic and microtubular protein that binds brain snapin
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(20): 3041 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
W. Hennah, P. Thomson, L. Peltonen, and D. Porteous
Genes and Schizophrenia: Beyond Schizophrenia: The Role of DISC1 in Major Mental Illness
Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(3): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
N. Craddock, M. C O'Donovan, and M. J Owen
Genes for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder? Implications for Psychiatric Nosology
Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 9 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/4/800    most recent
sbi061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?