Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on August 24, 2005
Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi045
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Cognitive remediation is a behavioral intervention designed to improve cognition in people who have suffered a decline in neuropsychological functioning. The application of cognitive remediation for people with schizophrenia has become increasingly popular. In this article we attempt to determine what factors moderate outcome in cognitive remediation. This issue is of primary concern, as the efficacy of treatments largely depends on the appropriate selection of individuals and treatment methodologies that are most likely to yield gains. Three databases were examined, dividing the samples into participants who showed or did not show a marked improvement from baseline to posttest. We examined patient, illness, and treatment factors that might affect treatment response. Whereas certain patient and treatment variables did differentiate "Improvers" from "Nonimprovers," illness factors were the least likely to influence treatment outcome. Treatment intensity, type of cognitive remediation program, and therapist qualifications were identified as key treatment variables. Patient levels of motivation for treatment and baseline sets of work habits were also important moderators. While the issue of treatment intensity appears to be especially salient, there is evidence that to some extent patient and treatment variables intertwine to produce a positive response to cognitive remediation.
Article
What Predicts a Good Response to Cognitive Remediation Interventions?
1 Montefiore Medical Center, Klau-2, 111 East 210 Street, Bronx, NY 10467; Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
2 Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
Alice Medalia, E-mail: amedalia{at}aol.com
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Gioia Understanding the Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing Using an Ethnographic Approach Qual Health Res, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 1495 - 1503. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Choi, T. Mogami, and A. Medalia Intrinsic Motivation Inventory: An Adapted Measure for Schizophrenia Research Schizophr Bull, April 21, 2009; (2009) sbp030v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Cheney, A. Flower, and T. Templeton Applying Response to Intervention Metrics in the Social Domain for Students at Risk of Developing Emotional or Behavioral Disorders Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2008; 42(2): 108 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Schwalbe and A. Medalia Cognitive Dysfunction and Competency Restoration: Using Cognitive Remediation to Help Restore the Unrestorable J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 518 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Brekke, M. Hoe, J. Long, and M. F. Green How Neurocognition and Social Cognition Influence Functional Change During Community-Based Psychosocial Rehabilitation for Individuals with Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(5): 1247 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Pfammatter, U. M. Junghan, and H. D. Brenner Efficacy of Psychological Therapy in Schizophrenia: Conclusions From Meta-analyses Schizophr Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(suppl_1): S64 - S80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. I. Velligan, R. S. Kern, and J. M. Gold Cognitive Rehabilitation for Schizophrenia and the Putative Role of Motivation and Expectancies Schizophr Bull, July 1, 2006; 32(3): 474 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|