Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on May 17, 2006
Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj075
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dawn I. Velligan 1 *,
Yui-Wing Francis Lam 2,
David C. Glahn 1,
Jennifer A. Barrett 1,
Natalie J. Maples 1,
Larry Ereshefsky 3,
and
Alexander L. Miller 1
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The definition and assessment of adherence vary considerably across studies. Increasing consensus regarding these issues is necessary to improve our understanding of adherence and the development of more effective treatments. We review the adherence literature over the past 3 decades to explore the definitions and assessment of adherence to oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients. A total of 161 articles were identified through MEDLINE and PsycINFO searches. The most common method used to assess adherence was the report of the patient. Subjective and indirect methods including self-report, provider report, significant other report, and chart review were the only methods used to assess adherence in over 77% (124/161) of studies reviewed. Direct or objective measures including pill count, blood or urine analysis, electronic monitoring, and electronic refill records were used in less than 23% (37/161) of studies. Even in studies utilizing the same methodology to assess adherence, definitions of an adherent subject varied broadly from agreeing to take any medication to taking at least 90% of medication as prescribed. We make suggestions for consensus development, including the use of recommended terminology for different subject samples, the increased use of objective or direct measures, and the inclusion in all studies of an estimate of the percentage of medication taken as prescribed in an effort to increase comparability among studies. The suggestions are designed to advance the field with respect to both understanding predictors of adherence and developing interventions to improve adherence to oral antipsychotic medications.
Article
Defining and Assessing Adherence to Oral Antipsychotics: A Review of the Literature
1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
3 California Clinical Trials, Glendale, CA
Dawn I. Velligan, E-mail: velligand{at}uthscsa.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Valenstein, J. Kavanagh, T. Lee, P. Reilly, G. W. Dalack, J. Grabowski, D. Smelson, D. L. Ronis, D. Ganoczy, E. Woltmann, et al. Using A Pharmacy-Based Intervention To Improve Antipsychotic Adherence Among Patients With Serious Mental Illness Schizophr Bull, November 21, 2009; (2009) sbp121v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Smith and L. I. Sederer A New Kind of Homelessness for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness? The Need for a "Mental Health Home" Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2009; 60(4): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Lanouette, D. P. Folsom, A. Sciolla, and D. V. Jeste Psychotropic Medication Nonadherence Among United States Latinos: A Comprehensive Literature Review Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2009; 60(2): 157 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C Martin, E. K Wiley-Exley, S. Richards, M. E Domino, T. S Carey, and B. L. Sleath Contrasting Measures of Adherence with Simple Drug Use, Medication Switching, and Therapeutic Duplication Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2009; 43(1): 36 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Beebe, K. Smith, C. Crye, C. Addonizio, D. J. Strunk, W. Martin, and J. Poche Telenursing Intervention Increases Psychiatric Medication Adherence in Schizophrenia Outpatients Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, June 1, 2008; 14(3): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Velligan, P. M. Diamond, J. Mintz, N. Maples, X. Li, J. Zeber, L. Ereshefsky, Y.-W. F. Lam, D. Castillo, and A. L. Miller The Use of Individually Tailored Environmental Supports to Improve Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(3): 483 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Velligan, M. Wang, P. Diamond, D. C. Glahn, D. Castillo, S. Bendle, Y. W. F. Lam, L. Ereshefsky, and A. L. Miller Relationships Among Subjective and Objective Measures of Adherence to Oral Antipsychotic Medications Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 2007; 58(9): 1187 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Mitchell and T. Selmes Why don't patients take their medicine? Reasons and solutions in psychiatry Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2007; 13(5): 336 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Stover, L. Brady, and S. R. Marder New Paradigms for Treatment Development Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(5): 1093 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Singh, A. J. Massey, M. D. Thompson, L. R. Rappa, and M. S. Honeywell Addressing Nonadherence in the Schizophrenic Population Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2006; 19(6): 361 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||





