Skip Navigation



Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published online on August 16, 2007

Schizophrenia Bulletin, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm092
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/3/423    most recent
sbm092v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2007.

Less Unique Variance Than Meets the Eye: Overlap Among Traditional Neuropsychological Dimensions in Schizophrenia

Dwight Dickinson1,2,3 and James M. Gold2,3
2 VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Baltimore, MD
3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed; VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, 10 North Greene Street, Suite 6a (BT/MIRECC), Baltimore, MD 21201; tel: 410-605-7817, fax: 410-605-7739, e-mail: Dwight.Dickinson{at}va.gov.

The magnitude of the overlap among dimensions of neuropsychological test performance in schizophrenia has been the subject of perennial controversy. This issue has taken on renewed importance with the recent focus on cognition as a treatment target in schizophrenia. A substantial body of factor analytic literature indicates that dimensions are separable in schizophrenia. However, this literature is generally uninformative as to whether the separable dimensions are independent, weakly correlated, or strongly correlated. Factor analyses have often used methods (ie, principal components analysis with orthogonal rotation) that preclude this determination, and correlations among factor-based domain composites and underlying measures have been reported infrequently in these studies. Current meta-analyses of reported "between-dimension" correlations for individual neuropsychological measures and for cognitive domain composite variables indicate that cognition variables in schizophrenia are correlated, on average, at a "medium" level of r = 0.37 for individual measures from different cognitive dimensions and r = 0.45 for domain composites. Because these are mean bivariate correlations, the multiple correlation of an individual measure with all the other measures in a cognitive battery is likely to be higher. Measure reliabilities of 0.80 or less also imply greater commonality among traditional neuropsychological measures. In short, there are underappreciated constraints on the amount of reliable cognitive performance variance in traditional neuropsychological test batteries that is free to vary independently. The ability of such batteries to reveal cognitive domain–specific treatment effects in schizophrenia may be much more limited than is generally assumed.

Keywords: schizophrenia / cognition / correlation / neuropsychological assessment / clinical trials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
D. Dickinson and P. D. Harvey
Systemic Hypotheses for Generalized Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia: A New Take on An Old Problem
Schizophr Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 403 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.